Doesn’t your slave ever need to orgasm?
No. He needs milking, not an orgasm. The only orgasm he needs is mine.
If you slave does not have orgasms anymore, does he get frustrated or angry about being denied something so fundamental to being a man?
He is not a man, he is a submale, so an orgasm is not fundamental to him. Having his penis caged and controlled and being milked is. At first he went through withdrawals like any other addict, but that soon passed.
And really, that is the point. If he works hard enough, and does a good enough job she should be able to find all of the satisfaction he actually needs in her orgasm.
I love my husband, and love to make love to him, I just don’t let him cum. That pleasure is all mine. He can enjoy all the ecstasies from the union between our bodies, all the anticipation and all the expectancy, minus the orgasm. Those he gives to me, exclusively. When we lay down together afterward, I’ll be drifting in the blissful peace of a post-orgasmic glow, while he will still be floating high on an unpopped bubble swollen tense with denial. It’s beautiful.
Unfortunately, prostate milking is a necessity for the healthful maintenance of a male in long term/permanent chastity. While it is an unpleasant chore for you, males are pathetic and will choose to view any physical contact, like her hand on his rump, as sexual.
A prostate milking tool is ideal for this task and rubber golves are a MUST. Rather than the thin exam style gloves seen here that allow for the semblance of physical contact, I recommend that you go with heavy dish gloves or even industrial rubberized work gloves. The more barrier you can put between you and the male the better it is for him.
Although of a later generation, this was Nancy’s family; the women controlled the money, made the decisions, and did what they wanted when and with whomever they wanted. The men? Well, can you say housekeeping?
Housework: Her twelve women reported that their men did housework and had a routine of it to tend to when they came home, although some did less than others. Housework for hubby was a constant, everyday routine; he had something to do, and that something took two-three hours a night on weekdays and could be twice that on days he was off work. Never mind that she didn’t have a job outside the home; he did housework and he did it because she insisted he do it; and he did how she wanted it done. Husbands were shown what to do, and if things weren’t done right, they would be done over and over again, if need be, until he got it right.
Controlling the money: By controlling the money, Women were able to establish and maintain control of their relationship. Checks came home in that era and were handed over to wives who took care of the banking, bills and expenses. Many of them also channeled money into personal bank accounts that they’d set up for themselves. Men on the other hand were given an allowance and required to stay within a budget. A man could ask for more but he’d seldom get it; her “No!” didn’t require justification.
All the women interviewed controlled their husband’s social life. If he wanted to go to a game, for example, he had to ask permission, which was seldom given, and always with limitations—on how much money he could spend and when he had to be home. This was a practical concern. “The more he spent, the less for me,” one woman commented, adding, “and I wasn’t going to have that!” Controls on his social life also were aimed at keeping him away from “bad influences” that might make him hard to control. when their men returned home, the wives expected to be told what went on.
One woman noted that she could be a “real bitch” when she didn’t get her way; and her hubby agreed and confirmed that her “motivational speaking” kept him in line. Men’s favorable comments about “bitching” stem from them appreciating women telling them exactly what they wanted.
And, yes, there was physical punishment administered by all the ladies surveyed, usually in combination with “motivational speaking,” often with a slap or two and a few kicks thrown in for good measure. What prompted such a physical reprisal? Usually insubordination of some sort or complaining on the part of a man.